Ralph Hinterkeuser
21-Jul-2001, 20:41
I continue working with the 5/7 inch and have scans made afterwards, because th ere just might be someone liking laaarge prints made... I mean: besides myself.
To that respect I need the FRIENDS help for three questions here:
1. As I obviously will have to have made professional scans for 2000 - 3000 $ th is year I am strongly thinking of doing it myself ? and then doing even more of course, for the sake of better photos in the world. What do you recommend in my case: 5/7??-negatives, laserprints on Fuji Frontier up to 25/38 cm or Lambdas f or up to possibly 50/80 cm - and probably not the super-patient-guy happily oili ng and de-oiling his most-liked photographs? Up to now I work with professionals who do that oiling; others that didn?t (like me on my own Microtek ScanMaker 4) came up with Newton rings and lots of lines corresponding the track of the scan ner.
2. What would the test-guys say: from what printing size on (laserprints on Fuji Frontier up to 25/38 cm or Lambdas for the bigger ones) 5/7 does really bring a n advantage to 4/5 or 6/7/9 cm?
3. My Microtek ScanMaker 4 with Silverfast does really a good job concerning col our and detail. But I bought it used and have the mentioned lines in it, which r efuse to leave their place after each and every cleaning session. Plus the Newto n rings that occur regularly. What can be done against these problems? Do you th ink, scans for the above use can ever be produced on this machine?
Enough words from my side. Thanks for your kind cooperation! You?re great outsid e there!
Ralph
To that respect I need the FRIENDS help for three questions here:
1. As I obviously will have to have made professional scans for 2000 - 3000 $ th is year I am strongly thinking of doing it myself ? and then doing even more of course, for the sake of better photos in the world. What do you recommend in my case: 5/7??-negatives, laserprints on Fuji Frontier up to 25/38 cm or Lambdas f or up to possibly 50/80 cm - and probably not the super-patient-guy happily oili ng and de-oiling his most-liked photographs? Up to now I work with professionals who do that oiling; others that didn?t (like me on my own Microtek ScanMaker 4) came up with Newton rings and lots of lines corresponding the track of the scan ner.
2. What would the test-guys say: from what printing size on (laserprints on Fuji Frontier up to 25/38 cm or Lambdas for the bigger ones) 5/7 does really bring a n advantage to 4/5 or 6/7/9 cm?
3. My Microtek ScanMaker 4 with Silverfast does really a good job concerning col our and detail. But I bought it used and have the mentioned lines in it, which r efuse to leave their place after each and every cleaning session. Plus the Newto n rings that occur regularly. What can be done against these problems? Do you th ink, scans for the above use can ever be produced on this machine?
Enough words from my side. Thanks for your kind cooperation! You?re great outsid e there!
Ralph